D300 or D7000?

Similarly to the hundreds of others out there for quite a while I also toyed with the idea of selling D300 and getting the all-new D7000. So when an opportunity of getting a new D7000 for a very reasonable price presented itself I jumped on it...


The fact that I was in an exotic location, where I could put the machine into the tests within hours of the purchase, helped with the decision making process. The idea was to use the opportunity to get a cheap D7000 whilst abroad, get back, sell D300 and reduce the size and weight of my gear bag for future travels whilst improving an overall quality of the pictures (well, technological quality, not necessary meaning that I will take better pictures!). With the Internet buzzing with all the reviews about the greatness and superiority of the D7000 it sounded like the way forward. Well, two weeks later I am back to D300 whilst the D7000 enjoys having a new owner...

By this point many of you are already wondering: why? What’s wrong with it? Is it the hot pixels?
No – I haven’t seen any hot pixels and, if it comes to the picture quality, there is absolutely no problem with the camera. Quite the opposite: sharpness, noise, colour reproduction and metering of D7000 feels like two steps ahead of D300. Improvements in the picture quality are significant, no doubt about that. And there are many other great futures that D300 is in dire need for:
* ISO100 is back in D7000 – which means you may just get away without the 2-step ND filter to get the blur…

* low-light is no more a problem for D7000: ISO1000 produces photos - see for yourself below!

* putting the camera into Live View is now much more usable without the need for going back to your dials.

* the camera is extremely quiet compared with D300. Helpful if you shooting temples or events. And that’s without switching to the Quiet mode

* the virtual horizon is absolutely fantastic. I am not talking about the flight-simulator gadget on the Live View but about using it in your viewfinder. Assign the Fn button to switch your virtual horizon, get all your settings in place, switch it on and off you go: whether it’s a tight indoor shot or a set for panorama you’ll find all your photos perfectly levelled. Sweet!



Handhels @ ISO1000: no noise, great colours...

So, with all the great features and qualities already outlined you probably asking why on mother Earth did I go back to D300? Well, first of all, getting a smaller and lighter camera also meant getting a less comfortable grip, lesser built quality and, after a couple of ours of running around a historic site with a viewfinder glued to your face, pain in your arm. There are also some other caveats that make the switch to a smaller, less robustly built camera hard if you got used to toying with something like D300. So, in a nutshell, things that did not quite work:

* the grip is much less comfortable. It’s thinner and makes your hand feel crammed. I do not have big palms, though the small finger was hopelessly looking for somewhere to rest on. After half a day of running up and down ruined temples my palms were desperately calling for some rest!

* reduction in size also comes with less substantially rubberised grip – something that becomes apparent when you need to held the camera in one hand whilst hanging at the edge of wall holding with one hand to a tree or scaffolding. Probably not the most common position for photos, but I really liked the security that the rubberised grip of D300 provided. It feels that you will have that extra grip when you need it – and save your gear from high-impact meeting with the ground…

* rather annoying effect of down-sizing the camera is much smaller controls wheel at the back of the body. Add the OK button in the middle of the wheel and it becomes less accurate and slower in getting your focus points in the place you what them. Because of the extra button the thumb is not resting as comfortable as on D300. It also feels that the wheel is too low, hence you end up desperately pressing the LiveView lever instead…

* pixels and less buffer also can prove to be a problem in some situations. The buffer fills quickly up, stopping any operations for quite a while (a cup of tea or two…). On a number of occasions the last of the shots of fast-moving objects was the one that worked – well, you may just miss it when the buffer overflows and there is a long period of silence from the shutter! Examples? The two shots below are both taken as one of the last in a sequence…

* finally, if it comes to the built quality, D7000 feels less substantial. For example, pop-up flash feels cheap and about to pop out for ever!


None of the above may be a problem for many – especially if you coming from D90 or some of the smaller cameras. But for me these became a problem and so I will keep my eyes peeled for a wee longer till the D400 (or something similar) comes out.



When good buffer really mattered...

"Face" photography?

An interesting article has been recently published in NYTimes about the changes in the photo industry and how difficult it become to make living from photography (you can read the article here). Indeed, the dynamics have changed - and as an effect hundreds of photo seminars and tours have been mushrooming in the past years - with the prices constantly going up and reaching over a £1000 for a 4 days workshop in Scottish highland (and prices going through the roof for any course overseas). Looks like workshops, safaris, exotic islands are becoming the new bread and butter for many photographers.

But this article got me thinking about some other changes in the way photo industry has been developing. There are some big changes happening in the way photography is developing, affecting meaning (and the prices) of photo gear. One interesting thing happening is in Asia – especially China. It seems to be the next big thing to do: get the most expensive and the biggest SLR to take snapshots (in fully automatic mode) of the most famous landmarks around the world. Nothing to do with real photos you could get with the top-notch gear. What is needed is a snapshot of yourself and your family in front of the landmark. Done within 5 seconds...

It’s not about photography but to be able to show off to your friend that you have been there. Probably only for 5 minutes before the coach whizzed the tour off to the next BIG thing– but that’s surely enough… If you also show them that you went with full frame SLR with the biggest and heaviest lens (both mounted on a cheap tripod) – your face is saved…

Example of how important the landmark photo can be.
The Ye Liu Geological Park in Taiwan is undergoing some maintenance work and part of the park is off limits to visitors. Partly due to the visitors themselves (it was ever so important to carve your name on the rock formation or poke it with an umbrella when taking a photo that the fragile structures were about to fall).

Not only is part of the park closed – but it’s the part with the most known feature: the Queen’s Head rock formation. It’s known not only to Taiwanese – but also to mainland Chinese. And since Taiwan for some strange reason decided to open the tourist market to mainland China (fortunately there are some limitations) and Ye Liu is part of the “must do” itinerary – not the park itself but the Queen’s Head. The face issue seems double here: the “forbidden land” which is off limit just to some. Surely you need a photo to show you went there… (possibly you may also need to carve your name on the neck of the Head or at least touch it…)

Since the head was in the closed part of the park – and consequently the tours not very happy with the situation - the park decided to provide a duplicate of the most famous rock formation. Not only they replicate the head but also ensured that everybody can go back home with the precious shot with the head in the background. To make things easier and faster – traffic management system was put in place, specifying where to queue, where to stand to take a photo and where to stand to be taken photo of… To prevent any risk of non-compliance a “traffic warden” in hi-vis jacket with a whistle keeps an eye on things during the peak periods (i.e. when a tour bus arrives).

Everybody seems to be happy: the park, the Head and the hordes of tourists who came here just to get “the shot” of the (fake!) Head – so now they can show off to their mates (whilst torturing them with 5000 photos taken during the 3-days Grand Tour of Taiwan)…


waiting for your turn...


Quick! the whole bus has just a couple of hours for the whole park so no posing around!


Not only everybody would get a shot with the Head – but all the shots would look exactly the same – things could not be any easier! I hope all the cameras are in Auto and with “smile detector” on – just to make it more consistent…


And I thought that travel and photography were creative and personal pursuits.


I'm sure though that Canon and NIKON are over the moon with the trend – especially since its so important to have the best and latest SLR to take these sophisticated photos.

Would the next big thing would be to take your overpriced gear and get your shots whilst guided by a recognised photographer? Huge and cash rich market seems to be opening up to fill the gap created by shrinking incomes from stock photography. But how many would be able to endure the new breed of wanna-be-photographers???? Not me for sure!


UPDATE: I heard the rumours that the restrictions were because of the inflood of Chinese tourists who did cause a lot of damage to a lot of the sights. Now it was confirmed! The story goes that since Taiwan allowed Chinese tourists to visit new signs appeared in the public places: No Chewing gums, no spitting, no name carving!

I 2009 a 63-year-old Chinese tourist Zhao Genda decided to "CHINA" whilst visiting Yehliu. Others tried as well. So the site - and some others - are now suffering from more anti-vandalism restrictions. Pity as some of these places are magical!

The problem Taiwan is facing now is linked to another face-issue: for a lot of Chinese Taiwan is THE DESTINATION - a face-saver, jealousy-spinning pinnacle of travel. It's got nothing to do with sightseeing. It's the "forbidden fruit" that only some can reach. Add travel to Taiwan to your overpriced and huge camera gear and your FACE is safe... sometimes it all makes you wonder...

OBSERVATORY @ ISLE of MAY

Photographing wildlife requires both time and patience but it can also turn into an unforgettable adventure.

Imagine staying in one of the oldest lighthouses without electricity or shower (yuppie!!) but instead equipped with old-fashioned gas lamps, fire place and with air of history in each and every corner. Standing right on the cliff on a tiny tiny island with some of the largest bird colonies around, you can constantly hear sea waves hitting the cliffs mixed with the chatter of puffins, guillemots, sea gulls and occasionally eiders. When you sit on the porch having a cup of tea you are surrounded by puffins curiously watching your each move. And if you look carefully you can spot well camouflaged young gulls playing in the grass...

Observatory / Low Light at Isle of May



Map of the Isle of May


Some of the neighbours

Tourist boat comes just once a day (the best time for the nap!) and there is just a few others on the island. Most of time it's you and thousands of birds busily feeding their chicks.

When it comes to shooting - probably could not be any better. Starting from the sunrise the birds start their daily rituals. The light is great (if it's not raining that is!) and photo opportunities seem looming at each corner: puffins coming back from the sea or resting on the nearby rocks with bills filled with silver sand eels, razorbills curiously staring into the camera from the cliff below, eiders sitting in the middle of the path. It takes some time to both understand the pattern of behaviour of the wildlife (more about the techniques in the next entry) and for the birds to get used to the guy with a camera. But patience and practice can be hugely rewarding.

Puffins on Isle of May



Feeding time!


By the time the tourist boat comes to the island it's time for a snack and a nap. After a couple of days you feel this is your island!

The two days flew. By the next morning I got up early to get the last few shots but since the weather turned sour I ended up having a cup of tea and a breakfast on the front porch before getting down to cleaning the place. Once I set off I could hear some clapping. I first thought it was the Reserve manager making sure I know about the boat coming but when I went to the door there was nobody... strange...

I returned to the tango with a broom but then could hear more clapping - this time faster and lauder but also seemed coming from inside the lighthouse. Oh no - so the place is haunted I thought! I went to check it out and when I entered the other room I could hear fast clap-clap-clap somewhere around the bulk bed. I get down on the floor to have a look and there it was. Hiding underneath the bed, pretending not to see me (the usual strategy of "if I can't see you you can't see me"). A small, scared but curious puffling.

Safety underneath the bed...

Since I needed to lock the door I took the little fellow out but before I turned around it was back inside... After another chase around the room I got him out and put him underneath the bench and a wheelbarrow outside (sea gulls often try to catch young pufflings that just left the burrow). By the time I made it back inside it was knocking on the other (unused) door proving my point: it's an amazing and unforgettable place to stay. And probably one of the best photo trips ever!

ORKNEY: THE PERFECT PHOTO LOCATION?

Rolling green hills; standing stone circles, lochs, jagged cliffs, stunning sunsets and incredibly diverse wildlife - all of that within maximum an hour drive. Sounds perfect?


Orkney seems a paradise for photographers of many types - whether you into landscape or wildlife or underwater photography. The place seems to be too small to hold all of it and sometimes you may feel it will burst. No surprise that so many photo seminars and workshops are held on the magical islands as finding a great location seems so easy and hassle free.





Archaeological sites like mushrooms are popping up all over the place, at each turn or junction. Being often excavated by the local folks they hold stories and mysteries, they are the local folklore and the mirror into the past. Or rather many different pasts - from 5000 years ago to more recent, but equally fascinating events... History seems to be filling the air and your nostrils. Quirky, mysterious, unexplained but always surprising and engaging. Crime but not always punishment. Clashes of cultures. Twists and turns of unexpected magnitude...



In the summer the days are incredibly long, giving you more than ever time to explore and exploit photographic opportunities. Well, there is one not-so-great side of it: sunset and sunrise are spaced out so closely together that you will not be able to have a relaxing pint in a nearby pub in between. Instead prepare to suffer from sleep deprivation as 3-4 hours of sleep is all you can get if you want to make most of the light. But boy, it can be worth it! Dramatic sky, stone circles, waves fiercely slashing against the vertical cliffs washed in warm light of the sunset... that is if you lucky and got to see some of the sun at the right time! And if you do - it probably would not last.

Six nights and just one sunrise. Would I go back - oh boy, yes as this one hour was well worth it! Empty stone circle filled with busy chirping of birds,refreshing breeze and sun reflecting on the nearby lochs. The feeling of standing in the middle of over 5000 years of history. Time to reflect, time to relax. Time to breath in the unspoilt spirit of the far islands, the nature and purity. Click.



For the same money you could go to Croatia and get your sunset shot with 99% chances of clear sky - but trust me, Orkney will be much more rewarding though you may get just an hour of the perfect light. And for the remaining 5 days immerse into the history, into the ancient graves and dwellings. Combat the elements and enjoy the unpredictability of the weather. From the most dramatic sky to sunshine - in less than 5 minutes. Gale winds followed by the silence and stillness. Certain magnetism filling the air at all the time.

And if you still thrill for more - go for the local Orkney ice cream or the Dark Island.


Enjoying the Scottish Summer

WHICH CAMERA BAG???

Countless hours spent researching blogs and reviews, measuring different configurations of the camera and lenses; and pulling together a table with measures of different bags; sending a friend a shop to play with different bags and finally looking at the option of making my own made-to-measure padding for some high-street (or even better low street) bag...
Result: there is no perfect bag (as mentioned by many) but this should not stop you from trying to get the best option for the job - or jobs...

So far I owned quite a few backpacks and shoulder bags - and they come irreplaceable. Contrary to the Ken Rothwell's comment, they are damn useful if you hiking for the whole day - they are the best choice for your back and and mobility. I can't really see much pleasure in climbing munros with a belt made of holster-like pouches around my waist. It may give you a quicker access - but out there it's quite useless - there is no rush most of the time, you have plenty of time to prepare, get your shot, swig some single malt from the flask. Wild Wild West doesn't quite do it for me...

So after a few years of walking and shooting and owning a number of bags (they keep shrinking I think as every year I just need more space!) I learnt that a comfy camera bag that can also take some of your walking gear (waterproof, small stove and a flask) is just the perfect option. You can walk for hours, some scrambling is not a problem and your back would be grateful at the end of the day... I ended up using LowePro Fastpack 350. If need more space for walking gear or even more comfort I would take my Berghause bag and put a photo shoulder bag inside it. Works perfect...

Shooting cities with the Fastpack becomes a bit more of an issue: it screams "camera inside", you can't really put it on the ground whilst shooting (no problem when you hiking!) and sometimes you may need a faster access just not to miss one of the opportunities... add if you are using one of the f2.8 80-200 lenses you probably are already wondering what bag would do the job...

The task: D300 + 80-200mm f2.8 + 16-85mm VR + flash + all the accessories for a short city break to fit into a bag that will not attract too much attention from the local pinchers (handy if you in Rome), is comfy enough to keep you going for the whole day, would give you enough protection for the gear and, finally, fast access when needed. Sounds like a cross of Mission Impossible and Tetris?

Many of the bags I looked at seem always either too small in one of the dimensions (around 10cm wide seemed bit pointless - unless you want to end up dismounting the lens all the time), far too big, or still too photo-bag like. Carrying Billingham sounded like screaming: look I have really posh bag here and guess what's inside?

I watched local students to see what "normal" bags looked like and made you not want to pinch them... finally found one that had the right dimensions, didn't look like camera or laptop bag (still can't understand what's the point of the City Disguise bags - they don't look like camera bags - just like a laptop bag!). LowePro Classified series. And the 160 seemed just right: would take camera with mounted 80-200mm, offered good protection (something that Crumpler Muffin lacked considering crazy Scottish weather), quick access and it did not look like a camera bag...

OK - not cheap but I decided to give it a go and see how it performs.

The verdict: it's great. Takes hell lot of gear; top access is fantastic and allows you very quickly move in the crowd; well padded with plenty of configuration options; the front pocket is just the right size for a set of Lee filters. It can also be easily mounted on a bike rack (if you cycling) or slipped into a larger backpack if you hiking for a wee longer.

Things that could be improved?
the padding on the shoulder strap is fixed - which makes it a bit tricky if you try to carry the bag "messenger" style - I will probably end up replacing it with a different strap...
It would add so much more flexibility if the padding could be removed (like an insert) - so you could use it as a normal bag but also use the insert with e.g. panniers or a backpack.

Other than that - it was worth all the research and trouble. If you considering the bag - just get it! Well worth the money (and with a bit of research you can get it 20% cheaper than the RRP).

Photos of the bag in action will follow...

FILTERS, FILTERS: WHAT DO I REALLY NEED TO GET?

Lee, Formatt, Cokin??? Soft or Hard? ND or ND Grad? 1, 2, 3, or 10 steps? 0.4? 0.6? 0.9?

Although this was, and is, one of the secret tools of trade for landscape photographers, not many ventured that far in their photographic endeavours. The truth is they can make the difference between great and crap photo. If you not convinced - try and see for yourself. Soon you will be buying your filters, wondering how could you do landscape before...

My first encounter with filters was during a photo workshop with Jeremy Walker up north in Scotland and since then I got hooked: how could I take landscape photos without them before? So after the workshop I spend countless hours looking for the "perfect" filter set for my needs. Jeremy is a big advocate of Lee filters - and although they felt good during my initiation, the price tag and the huge choice of filters made it rather difficult to decide. Plus there were others: Cokin, Formatt or a countless number of no-name filters on eBay. So what do you really need and what would be the value for money?

Jeremy's famous saying during the workshop was that if he was to go on a trip with just one filter, it would be 2-stops hard graduated ND. But what would be the other filters you will need? I learnt it the hard way by getting a number of filters, than realising that I never use some of them. Thanks God for ebay as I actually made a bit of a profit through that lesson...

So what are the filters that you definitely should have in your bag? And which brads would perform the best?

I tried Lee (ND, hard ND Grads and Circular Polariser), Cokin (2 stop soft ND Grad), Formatt (ND) and happily skipped any "no-name" stuff shipped from China. After a chat with somebody at Lee I got convinced to buy the Lee Digital Starter Kit which contains holder, 2 stops hard ND Grad and 2 stops ND filter. This still is the core of the set I keep, however, as every curious novice, I needed to try for myself what the other filters were offering. So I soon got myself Lee circular polariser and, wondering about the hard / soft differences, Cokin soft 2 stops ND grad.

Cokin was first to be out from the bag and back on eBay: the material it is made from felt plastic compared to Lee, there was quite obvious colour cast and, as I soon found out, I hardly ever used soft grad filter. I still may give soft grad another go in the future but for sure it will not be Cokin... Although they are slightly cheaper than Lee, I found them inferior in both the performance and built quality.

So I was back to Lee and happily snapping away. However, I soon realised two things: I was not entirely happy with the circ polariser (having been using them before it seemed that Lee had somehow weaker effect than I was expecting). The other thing that became apparent was that 2 stops ND was just not enough in bright daylight. Although I could always use polariser and ND filter, this still was not always enough. I decided that would be happier with 1 stronger glass at the font so could keep the aperture at reasonable level without too much diffraction.

That's when I came across Formatt filters, as they offer 4 stops ND as standard (although you can order stronger one as well). The built quality is great, there is no colour cast and being about 1/3 cheaper than Lee, they are a definitely worth considering. The extra stop gives you that extra little bit flexibility when it is really needed - so if you tend to shoot in bright light and want to get some more blur into your photos, that's what you need.

Lee circular polariser ended up on eBay being replaced by Sigma 105mm polariser. Being about half the price of Lee it is much better value for money. The built quality and performance are great and again, this is one of the most useful filters to have in your bag.

So if you wandering what to invest into this is a free piece of advice I can give you:

Digital Starter kit by Lee offers superb quality and flexibility: whatever lenses you are using this is the only set you would need. Forget about screw-on filters as you would end up spending and carrying more in the future. This would also give you the two most useful filters you'd ever need: 2 stop ND and 2 stops ND Grad.Cokin Z-Pro series costs almost the same but the quality is far inferior compared with Lee or Formatt.

Circular Polarisers are not cheap. The best value for money I found was SIGMA 105mm (from Bristol Cameras). Great built, great performance.

If 2 stops ND is not enough - have a look at the superb Formatt 4 stops ND. Great for shooting in bright light when you need to introduce some more blur.

It is probably worth having a look at Formatt filters before you invest into Lee set as they may come cheaper but the quality is equally good. But since I never used their holders I can't say much about them.
nother handy gadget for your filters is the Lee 3-filter pouch as it just makes your life so much easier!

The Perfect combination: Lee Digital Starter Kit (Lee 0.6ND Grad Hard; Lee 0.6 ND, holder, pouch); Formatt 1.25 ND; Sigma Circular Polariser, 67mm Wide angle adapter and Lee soft cloth pouch for 3 filters.


From the top: Formatt 1.25 ND; Lee 0.6ND Grad Hard; Lee 0.6 ND.


From the left: Lee 0.6ND Grad Hard; Lee 0.6 ND, Formatt 1.25ND


Cokin 2 stops ND grad, Medium (soft) transition. It feels thinner, more plasticky than the rest. Gone on eBay...


Lee 0.6ND Grad Hard + Sigma Circular Polariser coupled with the Lee holder.

LIVE VIEV (LV) & D300: WHEN IS IT REALLY REALLY HANDY?

Upgrading from D200 to D300 inevitably means that the first thing you'd look for is where the £500 has gone...
Few more pixels - great; sensor cleaning - great; D-lightning - great; higher ISO - great.

Then you'd stumble to LV (LiveView) function on your dial and, if you used to viewfinder, probably would start wondering why... The screen does not swivel so pretty much useless at the time you cannot see through the viewfinder. In Olympus you can make a use of LV as the screen flips and swivels - so when low or high it makes your life just a wee easier.

Unless you a big fan of compacts I could not really find any value for that.
I fired it up numerous times whilst having the camera on tripod - but then got quickly annoyed with it and always ended up looking through the viewfinder to check the composition, settings, sharpness.
so what's the point of having it? so far I found it useless...

Until the D300 ended up attached to a massive Nikon 2000mm f11 reflex lens pointed at a couple of nesting Peregrine Falcons(see previous posts). Looking through the viewfinder and trying to focus makes you dizzy as every slightest move of the lens is magnified to 7 in Richter scale - your subject jumps up and down every time you touch the focus dial.

If your subject is not that big it becomes nearly mission impossible. And this is when LV comes handy for the first time: switch to LV, zoom on (yes, you can actually zoom in LV mode) onto your subject and voilà - you can actually see if your subject is sharp.

It gets better though... you got your subject sharp but now comes the wait. wildlife is not easy or quick: it can take hours (that's as far as I ever went!) to get your little friend to appear or do something worth shooting.

After 3 hours of looking through your viewfinder you'd probably get a job in Notre Dame (nice, round hutch, one eye bigger from the constant staring into the tiny light-hole and twisted fingers from pressing the remote).

Now imagine that instead of all that you are sitting on a nice, comfy chair watching TV with a beer in one hand and a remote in the other. Which one sounds like more fun? well, they the same! with LV and remote (preferably wireless) release you can put up a chair behind your camera, get a beer in one hand, remote in the other and just wait watching 3" screen with life NG channel on... could it be better?

This is where LV seems the best inventions since beer!


D300 mounted on Nikon 2000mm f11 lens with LV in action. Zommed on the subject so you can easily focus. Used with Seculine Twin-1 R4 means you can sit back, watch and press the remote. Big lens at the front means IR waves have something to bounce off so no issues with using remote from behind the camera.

GOOD NATURE OF NATURE WATCHERS

It doesn't happen often but there are some "good natured" people out there that can just make your day...

Making the most of cold but sunny weekend decided to go up to New Lanark and Falls of Clyde for a wee walk. It is the time of the year when peregrines start nesting with one of the pairs nesting just next to the public path (not that we knew it before setting off!). The Scottish Wildlife Trust takes no chances and set up a 24h watch of the nesting couple to make sure the eggs are not stolen or ruthlessly destroyed by pigeon fancies (yes, the weird people who think pigeons are the top animal to keep).

Two lads are constantly keeping a watch, encouraging visitors to peek through telescopes and answering any questions about the birds. For many here this is the first such a close encounter with these mighty birds - overall a great idea to raise awareness and get people interested in wildlife.

When I took out my camera and was about to put the 200mm lens on, one of the guys asked me what's the glass I'm using. I proudly told him "300mm on that one" and stared mounting it on the D300 body. At that point he disappeared in the shed and two minutes later re-appeared with a rocket launcher on a wooden stand in his hand (considering he was wearing green camouflage jacket it just didn't look good...)

"try this one" he said pointing at the rocket launcher... the mighty 2000mm f11 reflex lens by NIKON... 17kg of glass and steel, two knobs, built in filters and great optics... 3000mm on my digit!!!!!

I put the camera on, get it set up (not an easy task as no tripod would take this monster lens!) and took a few shots.



Nothing great but the experience of playing with the monster and the generosity of the guy are just such a refreshing experience.

How often does it happen that somebody offers you to play with their photo gear?

To learn more about the nesting pair of peregrines visit Peregrine Diaries. And if you around New Lanark in the next three months make sure you take a walk up the Clyde and have a look what they up to... and who knows - maybe you'll have a chance to see the unique 2000mm f11?



rocket launcher in action...



On the way back few shots of a friendly robin - this time with the tiny, shiny, lightweight Nikkor 200mm f2.8...

IMPORTANCE OF G&T IN PHOTOGRAPHY...

Nice sunny day in Glasgow (unusual, I know!), few white clouds on the sky and a good chance for magnificent sunset. so we decided to go to the quayside to get some "fantastic sunset" shots.

As it was windy, the prettier half decided to go and wait for me in the bar of the Crowne Plaza hotel, whilst I went on looking for the right spot.

After an hour of scoping for a good viewpoint (unsuccessful I'm afraid!), the sky getting blunter and blunter (flat, lifeless light) I finally gave up and started making my way to the hotel.

"no luck this time" I thought, took a couple of shots "to the sun" and went to the bar. fingers frozen, I needed a drink and G&T sounded like the right remedy... Damn - unlucky again as a small G&T costs a fiver (!!!) and it's not even with some nice, posh gin! well, "C'est la vie". we finished the drinks, sorted the bill with somehow unfriendly barman and left to fetch the car.

And that's when the ridiculous price of G&T finally was worth it! a view I was waiting for...



The conclusion is that if it wasn't for the overpriced and unfriendly G&T (well, the staff was unfriendly, Mr Gordon was OK) we would have gone home with not even one shot! Long live G&T (or any other alcoholic beverage that will keep you longer on - or near - the location!)

MADE (NOT) IN...

Yes, even companies like NIKON moved to the dark side. Recently I was looking at a new flashgun for my gear and, to my surprise, it now says
MADE IN CHINA

I was very happy with gear made in Japan, I was still happy when most of cameras and lenses came from Thailand.



The Granny in the Bubun village

But recently it becomes more and more difficult to ensure that whilst I try to capture an unspoilt landscape or endangered animal, the gear I use might have contribute to great environmental disasters through contributing taxes to governments with little concern?

This is a good questions for many photographers to address: can I look into the eyes of some nations knowing that the lens I look through contributes to their suffering???

All this thoughts crammed into my mind whilst spending time in Aboriginal village of Bunun tribe up in Taiwanese mountains...